quinta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2011

Google posts Honeycomb event video

Google posts Honeycomb event video: "

Did you miss our live coverage or just want to see all of Google's Honeycomb demos shown in video format? Well, Google has your back and has posted a video of their entire Honeycomb event on to YouTube. The video will run just over 50 minutes but is well worth the time as Google employees and guests show off apps, widgets, multitasking, notifications, and more. (And see if you can spot Phil!) [YouTube]

Google posts Honeycomb event video posted originally by Android Central

Sponsored by Android Cases and Accessories



"

Download This Honeycomb Theme For Google Chrome [HONEYCHROME]

Download This Honeycomb Theme For Google Chrome [HONEYCHROME]: "


This image has no alt text


Yes, I just used the word Honeychrome. It’s an awesome way to describe a new theme that designer Roman Nurik has made – the same guy that did the Android theme you guys all love and use for Chrome. If you’re digging blue instead and are excited for what Honeycomb will bring very soon, then be sure to download it. Just click this link within your Chrome browser to get started. [via Androinica]

"

How to Use "Who" and "Whom" Correctly

How to Use "Who" and "Whom" Correctly: "
Who or Whom?
Who or Whom?
The correct use of who and whom in questions may seem like a lost battle, still joined only by punctilious English teachers, but the correct usage remains important in formal writing. Even careful speakers have not yet surrendered the distinction either! After reading this article, you will feel more comfortable using the distinction of 'who' and 'whom' correctly.

Steps


  1. Understand the difference between who and whom. Both who and whom are pronouns. However, 'who' is used as the subject of a sentence or phrase, to denote who is doing something (like he or she). On the other hand, 'whom' is used as the object of a verb, to denote whom has something done to it (like him or her). While a preposition (at, by, for, in, with, etc.) often comes before 'whom', this is not always the case, so the key question is to ask 'who is doing what to whom'. What follows is a quick way to determine which pronoun to use in a particular question.
  2. Use whom when referring to the object of a verb.
    • To whom it may concern:
    • To whom did you talk today?
    • Whom does Sarah love?

  3. Use who when referring to the subject of a sentence or phrase.
    • Who brought the paper inside?
    • Who talked to you today?
    • Who went to dinner?
    • Who ate the cake?

  4. Ask yourself if the answer to the question would be he or him. If you can answer the question with him, then use whom. It's easy to remember because they both end with 'm'. If you can answer the question with he, then use who.
    • Example: A suitable answer to the question, 'To [who or whom] did the prize go?' is, 'It went to him.' (It is improper to say 'It went to he.') The correct pronoun for the question is whom.
    • Example: A suitable answer to the question, '[Who or Whom] went to the store?' is, 'He went to the store.' (It is improper to say 'Him went to the store.') The correct pronoun for the question who.

  5. When trying to decide whether who or whom is correct, simplify the sentence. Where other words in a complex sentence might throw you off track, simplify the sentence to include just the basic subject, verb, and object. It helps to move the words around in your head to identify the word relationships. For example:
    • 'Marie Antoinette and her ladies-in-waiting only invited people to their party [who or whom] they considered to love parties as much as they did.' The simplified mental version becomes: 'whom they considered.'
    • 'Marie Antoinette prevented her mother from knowing [who or whom] she invited to the Petit Trianon.' The simplified mental version becomes: '[who or whom] she invited.' Then, you could rearrange it again to say: 'she invited whom', clarifying that she did something to (invited) whom.

  6. The distinction between who and whom is less important in informal spoken language than it is in formal written language. It's possible that the distinction might someday erode away altogether. For now, though, it is important to keep the distinction clear in written language.

Video


Tips


  • Ask yourself 'who did what to whom?'
  • It is possible to write around problems involving who and whom, but the result is almost always clumsy. If you write 'To which person did the prize go?' because you can't remember that whom is the correct pronoun for such a question, you will have avoided a grammatical error at the expense of elegance.
  • Here's a useful mnemonic for remembering about objects and subjects; If you say 'I love you', then 'you' is the object of your affection and the object of the sentence. 'I' is the subject. '[Whom or Who] do I love?' is 'Whom do I love?' because the answer, 'you', is an object.
  • Learning another language can help greatly. In most languages, using 'who' in the place of 'whom' can cause great confusion. A great example of this is German or Spanish.

Warnings


  • There is much confusion and misuse on this topic. Just as correctly using whom may make others think that you are intelligent, misusing it may make you seem pompous. Never use whom as a subject pronoun. This is as incorrect as using who where whom is required. Many people will mistakenly believe that you are trying to be formal.
    • 'Whom are you?' is wrong. It is meant to be 'Who are you?'


Related wikiHows



Sources and Citations




Article Tools

"

quarta-feira, 2 de fevereiro de 2011

Desirability by the Numbers

Desirability by the Numbers: "


What does it take to be one of the most desirable women in the world? AskMen recently unveiled its Top 99 Women ranking, based on votes by more than 5 million people worldwide, and we were curious to find more about the ladies on that list. So we partnered with AskMen to slice and dice the 2011 ranking and discovered some interesting trends. From hair color to age to college degrees and careers, the details are in our latest infographic.




"

terça-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2011

What Development Board to Use?

What Development Board to Use?: "


Here at Hackaday, we see microcontroller based projects in all states of completion. Sometimes it makes the most sense to design systems from the ground up, and other times when simplicity or a quick project completion is desired, pre-built system boards are a better choice. We have compiled a list of boards that we commonly see in your submitted projects, split up by price range and with a little detail for reference.


After reading our list, sound off in the comments or on this forum post, and we may include your board in a follow-up guide at a later date. We will also be giving away 10 Hackaday stickers to the most insightful, the most original, and most useful advice given on the forum, so if you haven’t registered yet, now would be a perfect time. Winners of the sticker giveaway will be selected from the forum thread, and the final decision for prizes will be judged by the wit and whim of the Hackaday writing team. More prize details to follow in the thread. Read on for our guide based on past project submissions.









The Cheap ($0-$50):


When it comes to cheap boards, users can expect a simple breakout board, usually with some debugging facilities and minimal extra components. These boards tend to be aimed at hobbyists and the education crowd rather than companies who can afford full featured development setups for their engineers. Unfortunately, boards that come directly from manufacturers tend to have locked down or overly simplified IDEs or debugging software, though low price points often inspire the open source communities to write their own to take advantage of all the features.



  • TI’s MSP430 Launchpad: Coming in at $4.30, TI’s Launchpad board is definitely a bargain. For your money, you get a set of 16-bit MSP430 processors, a mini-USB debugger and programming interface, and a set of Windows IDEs to choose from. Not much more to write home about, but we have featured a number of projects with this family of microcontrollers running the show.

  • STMicroelectronic’s Discovery: Costing you a paltry $11.85, This 32-bit ARM processor may be one of the best performance to cost values. Similar to the Launchpad, the Discovery has a mini-USB interface, a breakaway programmer and debugger, and a few locked down IDEs to select. For students or professionals looking for experience with the ARM architecture, this Cortex-M3 based system would be a great place to start.

  • The Arduino Family: Needing no introduction, these 8-bit AVR based systems have been displayed by us numerous times. Due to an open source hardware and software design, these boards are available for as low as $20 or so for Arduino Compatable clones, or any price range up depending on included peripherals. Because of the simple IDE and coding environment familiar to anyone familiar with C, C++, or Java, the Arduino is a common choice for beginners, non-engineering types, and professionals alike.








Mid-Range Boards ($50-$150):


For a little more money, more can be expected from a development board. Often featuring higher I/O pin counts, more complex interfaces such as host USB ports, Ethernet, or Video-Out, these boards are a great place for a little computational and functional muscle. However, with a higher cost, it is more difficult to just throw one of these boards at any one-off project. More costly boards are often supported better as well, because they are used by engineers who will decide on important purchasing decisions. This area is also a transition area from more hardy microcontroller type boards into the more powerful microprocessor type systems (such as shifting from the Cortex-M to the Cortex-A series of ARM processors).



  • The Arduino Mega: For all the same reasons as the original Arduino, the Arduino Mega has its place in a prototyping or development environment. For a bit more money than the original, extra code space, processing power, and I/O pins are gained, with the same comfortable, familiar, and similar development tools. The Arduino Mega runs at $65, which makes for a costly 8-bit system.

  • The Chumby Hacking Board: An interesting example of a product going from production to prototyping as an afterthought, this board is based on the guts of the Chumby One, featuring a 32-bit Freescale i.MX ARM processor at 454 MHz. This system has video out, as well as a trio of USB ports for all the peripherals you can find or write your own drivers for. The Chumby Hacking board clocks in at a reasonable $90 or so, though supplies seem to be dwindling, so act fast if interested.

  • The Original BeagleBoard: At the top of the price range, the BeagleBoard (Revision C4) features a 600 MHz Cortex-A8 ARM processor capable of running a number of Linux systems, including Angstrom and Ubuntu. Designed to interface with cool toys like touchscreens, this board also features a powerful DSP chip for crunching numbers, as well as processing video and sound. For a newly discounted rate of $125, this compact powerhouse could be yours.





The Upper Crust ($150+)


At this price range, these boards often contain ARM processors from the Cortex-A series, and have more in common with high-end smartphones than the microcontrollers usually seen on Hackaday and in day-to-day life. Boards like these are a real investment, and often cost and perform similar to many older or low-end PCs and netbooks at a considerably more efficient performance to power use ratio in most cases. These boards tend to run Linux-based operating systems, including Android as well as others.



  • The BeagleBoard xM: Coming in at just around $150, this big brother to the first BeagleBoard adds parts such as onboard Ethernet, an additional 2 USB ports, and a bump to a 1 GHz processor. Although the MSRP is listed at $149, a high demand has pushed the cost well above that at places where stocks are even available. Because of a strong similarity to the original BeagleBoard, the existing community is strong, and full of examples and guides to get the board going

  • The PandaBoard: With features as far away from an 8-bit microcontroller as imaginable, this board comes dressed to the nines featuring a dual-core 1 GHz processor capable of handling 1080P video stream. We realize this is probably out of the ballpark of just about any “hack” level project at $174, but we know there are some engineers out there very excited to see this.


In Summary:


We know that brand and experience preference can be a strong motivator, so be productive with your advice and sound off in our forum with your picks for our follow-up post(s). We will do our best to wrap up all the information you provide into a more definitive, and hopefully even more informative guide for beginners and professionals alike.



Filed under: parts

"

What's Happening in Egypt, the Action Movie Explainer: "Raiders of the Lost Mubarak"

What's Happening in Egypt, the Action Movie Explainer: "Raiders of the Lost Mubarak": "raiders.jpg

After she realized many people couldn't wrap their heads around what was going on in Egypt, Furrygirl decided to turn to Hollywood staples and made this Raiders of the Lost Ark mashup version which explains things pretty clearly.


Full graphic follows, below...

233682822.jpg




"

domingo, 30 de janeiro de 2011

Challenger: January 28, 1986

Challenger: January 28, 1986: "
'Challenger: January 28, 1986'
"

100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections

100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections: "

They often seem disreputable, like sullen idlers loitering in a public thoroughfare, but they actually do a lot of hard work and are usually persnickety about the tasks to which they are put. They are interjections — one class of them, anyway: those lacking etymological origins but packed with meaning.


But how do you know how to distinguish similar ones — or spell them, for that matter? Here’s an incomplete inventory of interjections (not including variations of actual words such as yeah for yes or onomatopoeic echoes of externally produced sounds like boom):


Ack communicates disgust or dismissal.


Ah can denote positive emotions like relief or delight (generally, pronounced with a long a).


Aha signals triumph or surprise, or perhaps derision.


Ahem is employed to gain attention.


Argh, often drawn out with additional h’s, is all about frustration.


Aw can be dismissive or indicative of disappointment, or, when drawn out, expressive of sympathy or adoration.


Aye denotes agreement.


Bah is dismissive.


Blah communicates boredom or disappointment.


Blech (or bleah or bleh) implies nausea.


Boo is an exclamation to provoke fright.


Boo-hoo is imitative of crying and is derisive.


Boo-ya (with several spelling variants) is a cry of triumph.


Bwah-hah-hah (variously spelled, including mwah-hah-hah) facetiously mimics the stereotypical archvillain’s triumphant laugh.


D’oh is the spelling for the muttering accompanying Homer Simpson’s trademark head-slapping self-abuse.


Duh derides someone who seems dense.


Eek indicates an unpleasant surprise.


Eh, with a question mark, is a request for repetition or confirmation of what was just said; without, it is dismissive.


Er (sometimes erm) plays for time.


Ew denotes disgust, intensified by the addition of one or more e’s and/or w’s.


Feh (and its cousin meh) is an indication of feeling underwhelmed or disappointed.


Gak is an expression of disgust or distaste.


Ha expresses joy or surprise, or perhaps triumph.


Ha-ha (with possible redoubling) communicates laughter or derision.


Hamana-hamana, variously spelled, and duplicated as needed, implies speechless embarrassment.


Hardy-har-har, or har-har repeated as needed, communicates mock amusement.


Hee-hee is a mischievous laugh, while its variants heh and heh-heh (and so on) can have a more derisive connotation.


Hey can express surprise or exultation, or can be used to request repetition or call for attention.


Hist signals the desire for silence.


Hm, extended as needed, suggests curiosity, confusion, consternation, or skepticism.


Hmph (also hrmph or humph) indicates displeasure or indignation.


Ho-ho is expressive of mirth, or (along with its variant oh-ho) can indicate triumph of discovery.


Ho-hum signals indifference or boredom.


Hubba-hubba is the vocal equivalent of a leer.


Huh (or hunh) is a sign of disbelief, confusion, or surprise, or, with a question mark, is a request for repetition.


Hup, from the sound-off a military cadence chant, signals beginning an exerting task.


Hurrah (also hoorah, hooray, and hurray, and even huzzah) is an exclamation of triumph or happiness.


Ick signals disgust.


Lah-de-dah denotes nonchalance or dismissal, or derision about pretension.


Mm-hmm, variously spelled, is an affirmative or corroborating response.


Mmm, extended as needed, conveys palatable or palpable pleasure.


Mwah is suggestive of a kiss, often implying unctuous or exaggerated affection.


Neener-neener, often uttered in a series of three repetitions, is a taunt.


Now (often repeated “Now, now”) is uttered as an admonition.


Oh is among the most versatile of interjections. Use it to indicate comprehension or acknowledgment (or, with a question mark, a request for verification), to preface direct address (“Oh, sir!”), as a sign of approximation or example (“Oh, about three days”), or to express emotion or serves as a response to a pain or pleasure. (Ooh is a variant useful for the last two purposes.)


Oh-oh (or alternatives in which oh is followed by various words) is a warning response to something that will have negative repercussions.


Olé, with an accent mark over the e, is borrowed from Spanish and is a vocal flourish to celebrate a deft or adroit maneuver.


Ooh, with o’s repeated as needed, conveys interest or admiration, or, alternatively, disdain.


Ooh-la-la is a response to an attempt to impress or gently mocks pretension or finery.


Oops (and the jocular diminutive variation oopsie or oopsy and the variant whoops) calls attention to an error or fault.


Ouch (or ow, extended as needed) signals pain or is a response to a harsh word or action.


Oy, part of Yiddish expressions such as oy gevalt (equivalent to “Uh-oh”), is a lament of frustration, concern, or self-pity.


Pff, extended as needed, expresses disappointment, disdain, or annoyance.


Pfft, or phfft, communicates abrupt ending or departure or is a sardonic dismissal akin to pff.


Phew, or pew, communicates disgust, fatigue, or relief. (Phooey, also spelled pfui, is a signal for disgust, too, and can denote dismissal as well. PU and P.U. are also variants.)


Poof is imitative of a sudden disappearance, as if by magic.


Pooh is a contemptuous exclamation.


Pshaw denotes disbelief, disapproval, or irritation or, alternatively, communicates facetious self-consciousness.


Psst calls for quiet.


Rah, perhaps repeated, signals triumph.


Shh (extended as necessary) is an imperative for silence.


Sis boom bah is an outdated encouraging cry, most likely to be used mockingly now.


Tchah communicates annoyance.


Tsk-tsk and its even snootier variant tut-tut are condemnations or scoldings; the related sound tch is the teeth-and-tongue click of disapproval.


Ugh is an exclamation of disgust.


Uh is an expression of skepticism or a delaying tactic.


Uh-huh indicates affirmation or agreement.


Uh-oh signals concern or dismay.


Uh-uh is the sound of negation or refusal.


Um is a placeholder for a pause but also denotes skepticism.


Va-va-voom is an old-fashioned exclamation denoting admiration of physical attractiveness.


Whee is an exclamation of excitement or delight.


Whew is a variant of phew but can also express amazement.


Whoa is a call to halt or an exclamation of surprise or relief.


Whoop-de-doo and its many variants convey mocking reaction to something meant to impress.


Woo and woo-hoo (and variations like yahoo, yee-haw, and yippee) indicate excitement. (Woot, also spelled w00t among an online in-crowd, is a probably ephemeral variant.)


Wow expresses surprise.


Yay is a congratulatory exclamation. (Not to be confused with yeah, a variant of yes.)


Yikes is an expression of fear or concern, often used facetiously.


Yo-ho-ho is the traditional pirates’ refrain.


Yoo-hoo attracts attention.


Yow, or yowza, is an exclamation of surprise or conveys being impressed.


Yuck (also spelled yech or yecch) signals disgust. (Not to be confused with yuk, a laugh.)


Yum, or yummy, is a response to the taste of something delicious and, by extension, the sight of an attractive person.


Zoinks is an expression of surprise or amazement popularized by the cartoon character Shaggy, of Scooby Doo fame.


Zowie, often in combination following wowie, a variant of wow, expresses admiration or astonishment.




Original Post: 100 Mostly Small But Expressive Interjections

Your eBook: Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.


"

Tour Eiffel - Paris 1960. By Paul Almasy

Tour Eiffel - Paris 1960. By Paul Almasy: "
'Tour Eiffel - Paris 1960. By Paul Almasy'
"

This Week in the Digital Photography School Forums (23-29 Jan ‘11)

This Week in the Digital Photography School Forums (23-29 Jan ‘11): "

Weekly Assignment


spot of color 2We finished up our Spot of Colour assignment this week. Using a spot of colour can have a big impact on where your eye travels in a photograph, especially though the use of bright or light colours. Our winners this week all successfully, and creatively, used a spot of colour in their photographs. Our winner this week was phillj blue bucket on the beach. This shot had a clear spot of colour, the composition was good with the way that the line of the water almost leads your eye right to the bucket, and overall it seemed to tell a story. Nicely done! Our first runner up was ttyler’s “Don’t Push It”, the shot of the typewriter keys. That red really stands out nicely, and it creates a nice, simple, almost graphical shot. And last but not least was Shutterbugdeb’s bright red lipstick. This shot was very nicely done, and very vivid. The red really stands out, and it’s clear that it’s not selectively coloured from the small amounts of colour elsewhere. It makes it very clear what colour is meant to stand out here. Well done everyone!


don't push itTouch of color Our newest assignment is Still Life: Food. For some of us, it’s a very dreary part of the year. It’s cold, the weather is less than ideal, and that can make it much more difficult to want to pick up the camera. But food still life shots are a great way to be creative without having to deal with the less than ideal weather. Food shots are a staple of still life photography. They can resemble the paintings of years past, or they might be the kind you would see in a cookbook, but either way, we want you to set up a food photo for this week’s assignment. As always, a quick reminder of the rules. First, your photo must have been taken between 19 January – 2 February 2011. Second, your post must include the words: “Still Life: Food” in order to show that that you have given your permission to be included in the contest, and the date that the photo was taken in order to show that it is eligible. Finally, your EXIF should be intact, and it’s useful if you can include some of the main points, such as camera, lens, aperture, ISO, shutter speed, etc. in the text of your post. Please limit yourself to one entry per person during the first week of the contest. Next week we will be looking at still life photos once again. But this time, our subject will be Still Life: Flowers. Flowers might seem like an overdone topic in photography, but we still photograph them. And as much as we love to photograph them, sometimes it is hard to get a good shot. Remember, this isn’t about taking a shot of your garden, this is a still life. So consider the design and placement of your subject, composition, and lighting. Good luck everyone!


Post from: Digital Photography School




"

Minha lista de blogs