Lisbon principles of sustainable governance

http://www.eoearth.org/article/Lisbon_principles_of_sustainable_governance

Lead Author: Robert Costanza (other articles)

Article Topics: Ecological economics, Sustainable development and Natural resource management and policy

This article has been reviewed and approved by the following Topic Editors: Nancy E. Golubiewski(other articles) and Cutler J. Cleveland (other articles)

Last Updated: August 9, 2007

At a workshop held in Lisbon, Portugal, in July 1997, sponsored by the Independent World Commission on the Oceans (IWCO) in conjunction with the Luso-American Development Foundation, a group of 16 scientists developed a core set of principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. These six principles are general enough to apply to the governance of our natural capital assets generally and are reproduced below:

Principle 1: Responsibility. Access to environmental resources carries attendant responsibilities to use them in an ecologically sustainable, economically efficient, and socially fair manner. Individual and corporate responsibilities and incentives should be aligned with each other and with broad social and ecological goals.

Principle 2: Scale-matching. Ecological problems are rarely confined to a single scale. Decision-making on environmental resources should (i) be assigned to institutional levels that maximize ecological input, (ii) ensure the flow of ecological information between institutional levels, (iii) take ownership and actors into account, and (iv) internalize costs and benefits. Appropriate scales of governance will be those that have the most relevant information, can respond quickly and efficiently, and are able to integrate across scale boundaries.

Principle 3: Precaution. In the face of uncertainty about potentially irreversible environmental impacts, decisions concerning their use should err on the side of caution. The burden of proof should shift to those whose activities potentially damage the environment.

Principle 4: Adaptive management. Given that some level of uncertainty always exists in environmental resource management, decision-makers should continuously gather and integrate appropriate ecological, social, and economic information with the goal of adaptive improvement.

Principle 5: Full cost allocation. All of the internal and external costs and benefits, including social and ecological, of alternative decisions concerning the use of environmental resources should be identified and allocated. When appropriate, markets should be adjusted to reflect full costs.

Principle 6: Participation. All stakeholders should be engaged in the formulation and implementation of decisions concerning environmental resources. Full stakeholder awareness and participation contributes to credible, accepted rules that identify and assign the corresponding responsibilities appropriately.

Further Reading

• Costanza, R. F. Andrade, P. Antunes, M. van den Belt, D. Boersma, D. F. Boesch, F. Catarino, S. Hanna, K. Limburg, B. Low, M. Molitor, G. Pereira, S. Rayner, R. Santos, J. Wilson, M. Young. 1998. Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science, 281:198-199.

This Informational Box is an excerpt from An Introduction to Ecological Economics by Robert Costanza,John H Cumberland, Herman Daly, Robert Goodland, Richard B Norgaard. ISBN: 1884015727

Citation

Costanza, Robert (Lead Author); Nancy E. Golubiewski and Cutler J. Cleveland (Topic Editors). 2007. "Lisbon principles of sustainable governance." In: Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. Cutler J. Cleveland (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment). [Published in the Encyclopedia of Earth August 9, 2007; Retrieved November 26, 2008]. <http://www.eoearth.org/article/Lisbon_principles_of_sustainable_governance>